Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air rouge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted (CSD A1)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Karada (talk • contribs)
[edit] Air rouge
Associated with my AFD nomination of Ledenair, not a single result for airrouge toulouse or "air rouge" toulouse heathrow, no relevant results for "Air Rouge", no mention of this airline flying from these airports on their sites, website provided doesn't resolve, no significant mentions on google.fr. Last but not least, the article spells their address wrong, spelt "Bordeaux" wrong (before I corrected it) and has no content other than an infobox which includes a rather poor quality logo. kateshortforbob 19:19, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, hoax. Said user has released presumably self-made logos to the public domain. Axem Titanium 19:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete , obvious hoax. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 19:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete Since its website doesn't exist this is an obvious hoax - and besides, as Axem points out, no airline would ever release its logo under the GFDL. Since the article consists of an infobox and nothing else, can it be speedied under A1 (no context)? Iain99 19:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- speedy delete as hoax - certainly as the below example is the same. --Rocksanddirt 20:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy under A1 as stated previously in related nomination. Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Tagged as A1 speedy as someone agreed with me. As an obvious hoax it probably falls under G3 as well. Iain99 20:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Hoax with no context. Delete it however you want to, just delete it. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 21:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.