Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aileen Passloff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was article sent to Wikipedia:Copyright problems. howcheng {chat} 19:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Aileen Passloff

Non-notable teacher. Speedy noticed twice, but DancingAsher keeps removing it. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Not encyclopedia material. Flyboy Will 02:44, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak delete. A professor, not a teacher. Participated in Obie-winning productions. Fulbright scholar. A good CV if verified (it isn't), but not quite encyclopedic. Durova 03:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Delete per Durova. Doesn't quite meet the professor test and is unverified. Definitely not a speedy candidate. Movementarian 03:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This woman is a legend. Prof, director, choreographer with her own company. Heavy major press coverage. No way close to a speedy. -- JJay 05:54, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Note: Tagged as direct copy of this. Bjelleklang - talk 06:04, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• That's a shame. I put the correct copyvio template on page. The fact that it is on AfD does not turn the copyvio into a speedy. Bard is not a commercial content provider. It would also help if noms made it a general practice to check for copyvio before nominating-- JJay 06:10, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing the tag! Am not sure about their copyright policy, but most educational institutions I've looked at have a policy that doesn't allow direct copying of text, so assumed the same here as well. Bjelleklang - talk 06:14, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• It probably is copyright and you were right to spot it and point it out. But the copyright page allows us 1 week to get permission. Speedy copyvios are supposed to be limited to commercial content (i.e. primarily magazine and newspaper articles, etc.). -- JJay 06:21, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

I know, but things went a little fast and I'm new to the process, so I just picked the first one I spottet. Thanks for the correction! Bjelleklang - talk 06:22, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep—appears reasonably notable having created works and received press coverage over many years. But should be rewritten if copyvio. The basic nature of the copied text doesn't fit with Wikipedia anyway.—Stombs 11:44, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.