Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidinism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete under WP:SNOW. Capitalistroadster 02:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Aidinism

Aidinism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Was previously deleted by WP:PROD. Has been recreated, so brought to AfD. No mention of this philosophical movement on Google news archive or Google books. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Wikipedia is not for stuff you made up one day. /Blaxthos 15:55, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete If a philosophy or religion is notable, it's unlikely that Wikipedia will be the very first place on the entire Internet for it to show up. Eleland 16:59, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N, WP:V, and probably WP:OR and WP:MADEUP while we're at it. Iain99 17:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I find it somewhat unlikely that Wikipedia is the only source for information on a legitimate religion, unless Jimbo promotes himself to God. Created by an SPA of the same name; nothing to suggest this exists (not even a link to their own website) — iridescent (talk to me!) 17:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I have to second Iain99's feelings, this has a rack of guidelines and policies it would appear to fail: WP:OR, Sect notability, WP:V, and as Iain mentioned, most possibly WP:MADEUP. Additionally, no references, and perhaps more telling, no external links given. ^Ariel♥Gold 19:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 19:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:OR at the very least. --Bfigura ^(talk) 19:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball Delete Article is clearly made up. You can't just slap a name on your own personal beliefs and make a wikipedia article on it. Tx17777 20:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete it's very obvious that this is made up. Oysterguitarist 22:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and salt because I'm certain this guy's just going to create the article again in the future otherwise; check out the Talk page. Propaniac 01:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.