Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 11:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ahem

Belongs in dictionary Mr. Vernon 06:54, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

• Move to dictionary, this is not a WP article. Tawker 06:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, Intuition is a vocabulary word, and it has an article here too. So must Ahem. It has a lot of potential. A future edit could include "Notable Quotes with the usage of Ahem" and other notabilities. --Shultz 07:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

• That was a joke, right? Adrian Lamo ·· 03:51, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

• Joke or not, it violates WP:BEANS. Stifle 02:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep as notable vocab word. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 07:51, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - wiktionary already has it. FreplySpang (talk) 08:06, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - it doesn't even belong in a dictionary.--TheDoctor10 (talk|email) 14:01, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. — ciphergoth 15:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not even convinced this is wiktionary worthy.--Isotope23 17:39, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per FreplySpang. Tvaughn05_e ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 22:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete... please don't start a page on uses of Ahem either; quotes belong on Wikiquote anyway (who are unlikely to want such a list). -- Mithent 23:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as already on Wiktionary. Stifle 02:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.