Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahar rug
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per new, reliable sourcing. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ahar rug
A non-notable type of rug. The article is written like an advertisment. Tavix (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, unsourced, no assertion of notability. Also consider Hariz Rug for deletion. ZappyGun (talk to me)What I've done for Wikipedia 20:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- 13,000 google hits, rug is detailed in numerous authoritive books on the subject, quite feasibly could be expanded into a full article. Article was proposed without consulting the creator originally. I can't really be bothered to answer here as it is a clear time waster. ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 10:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC).
-
- Reply 13,000 Google hits?! If you take a look, there are slightly under 1,000 hits. I see you have added some references which is what I was after originally anyway. Tavix (talk) 18:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- 13,000 google hits, rug is detailed in numerous authoritive books on the subject, quite feasibly could be expanded into a full article. Article was proposed without consulting the creator originally. I can't really be bothered to answer here as it is a clear time waster. ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 10:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC).
- Keep Seems to be a notable type of rug, as per the references provided, and I quite frankly cannot see how this could be seen as an ad. Meets WP:N and WP:RS. Could use a bit of work, but the groundwork is there. I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 19:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
