Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AgriFeeds
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete No independent sources to show notability. --Stephen 22:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AgriFeeds
Non-notable website, as per WP:WEB. Gary King (talk) 07:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gary, we have tried to follow the template used for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rojo.com. AgriFeeds a specialised freely available tool for news and events aggregation in agriculture, forestry, fisheries etc. This aggregator of domain specific news and events is facilitated by major players in the arena of agriculture such as FAO, DFID, CGIAR, etc. The page has been revised. Please see again and advice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.202.109.232 (talk) 08:57, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- comment I'd like to think it notable, but this would need some sort of outside sourcing to shown that people do know about it and use it and think it important. DGG (talk) 09:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment to the IP - presumably "we" is the Food And Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Do you have a conflict of interest? EJF (talk) 17:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi everyone, yes, in this case "we" is FAO but "we" also is actually those who have initiated the efforts. FAO is facilitator because we have contributed with our resources but the driver behind is also the communities. It is also our objective to serve the agricultural (including all the others like forestry, fisheries, etc.) with more specific information and this is one effort towards it. Lastly, this is a free service and it would be good to raise awareness in all means possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.202.109.232 (talk) 07:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
