The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin closure). Subject is notable. WilliamH (talk) 17:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Lacks notability and reads like and advertisement. It is orphaned, but that alone is not reason enough to delete. THobern 08:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep the sources check out in the Library of Congress catalogue, the authors of the sources seem to be very notable, I found evidence that it really is a government program through Google. Atyndall93 | talk 09:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Seems notable enough to me. Malinaccier (talk) 14:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.