Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aggregation awareness

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 22:31, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Aggregation awareness

It would be nice to think that the writer knew what he or she was talking about, because there's no clue for the casual reader. This might as well be in Swahili for all I can get out of it. And the phrase "Aggregation awareness" gets a mammoth 15 Google hits. Grutness|^hello? 04:06, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Deletion optimizer directs the admins to use the highest level of delete available. - Jersyko 04:28, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Maybe a merge to query optimizer? The sum total of my experience with database systems is a two-hour intro ten years ago, so I can't vouch for its accuracy, but it seems reasonable. —Korath (Talk) 19:07, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
  • Perhaps the fact that this apparently isn't the usual name for this isn't helping. "Aggregation awareness" as a phrase only occurs in Oracle 8i marketing blurbs and as a section heading in a paper. The more well-known concepts appear to be materialized views and aggregation tables (and perhaps summary tables) — see view and table. And read this. Uncle G 02:35, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC)
• Delete as content-free. --Carnildo 22:36, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, indeed content-free, and a dictdef even if the words meant something. Tempshill 22:37, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Nonsense without context. Dsmdgold 01:48, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.