Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agendism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Agendism

Agendism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Neologism I can't find in a real dictionary; thus WP:ATT/WP:NOR --Clay Collier 05:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, along with Agendist. Non-notable neologism with no even halfway reliable references. --Delirium 08:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not for things made up in school in one day. Storm05 15:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. fraggle 16:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. Please note that the term is used in the four references provided in the article. Whether they are reliable sources is a different matter. -- Black Falcon 19:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Of the four sources used here, the first two are blogs- one where the term is defined in a blog, and another where it is used without being clearly defined. Neither blog appears to be particularly notable or significant. The third source again uses the term without definition- it's an editorial on a gun ownership site by the same guy who wrote this piece- his bio is at the bottom. The final "citation" is actually just a link to a Google search result page for the related term 'agendistic', which returns a Urban Dictionary page and a few other uses in blogs and web editorials. None of which, in my opinion, constitutes adequate sourcing for an article on this term that wouldn't constitute original research or, at best, a dictionary definition. --Clay Collier 09:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, along with Agendist. Non-notable neologism, it seems to me. Might offer it to Wiktionary, but I suspect it fails their guidelines. WMMartin 14:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.