Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agartha

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 05:36, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Agartha

Not notable. r3m0t ^talk 08:30, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Gets lots of Google hits. Needs expansion and cleanup. RickK 08:32, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Valid topic, also different spellings possible Lectonar 09:57, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep after adding various stub and expand tags. Radiant_* 10:57, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
  • Subjects like this will keep developing so long as List of Subjects in Foucault's Pendulum stays up. Conspirators want it dead.
    • The above allegation by User:24.215.185.52
• Keep. Seems like real, if odd, "theory". Dsmdgold 19:34, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
• As far as I know, Agartha is occult symbol of enlightenment or something like that. The article of that particular subject could be relevant but not necessarily in this format. No vote- Skysmith 09:36, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Umberto Eco did not invent this, the "theory" of Agartha is commonsense (if such a thing is possible) amongst ocultists. Encyclopedic topic, though in serious need of expansion. VladMV ٭ ^talk 14:35, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.