Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Hours Formalwear
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sr13 is almost Singularity 03:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] After Hours Formalwear
NN company who's article doesn't provide sources. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 04:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete I'm not hungry for spam tonight. Very promotional in tone, and the only sources are their corporate website and a link to shareholder information. Needs to go Rackabello 07:11, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Removed the speedy tag as I got a hit on Google News within the past month. There's also an external link to a third-party news site (which is broken), which at least asserts some notabiltiy. --Sigma 7 09:51, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Chain with over 500 shops seems likely to be notable to me, and a web search shows no shortage of hits. Described as "the largest tuxedo rental and sales retailer in the U.S." here. JulesH 07:13, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep This is a large chain of clothiers in its own right. I'm the original creator of this article, and it appears a subsequent editor turned this into an ad. (The last time I messed with it was before it was bought by Men's Warehouse.) --Kitch (Talk : Contrib) 10:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - store exists in most malls that I have been to. Phil Sandifer 12:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable franchise with over 500 stores to speak of. Burntsauce 17:11, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep per Burntsauce, Kitch, JulesH, et al. Notable retailer, has plenty of locations nationwide. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 19:13, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Absolutely notable company. Article should be sourced and copy edited to eliminate any promotional slant. LACameraman 23:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.