Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afghan-American

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 14:55, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• This page cannot be deleted because of block-compress errors. -- AllyUnion (talk) 14:55, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Afghan-American

This was improperly and not completely posted to VfD. I'm finishing the process. No vote. —Mar·ka·ci:2005-02-13 16:42 Z

• Delete - if there is anything to say about Afghan-Americans it should be said, but at the moment this page is pointless--XmarkX 05:16, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. Delete the inappropriate link, it could probably use something about the Afghan-American community in Fremont, California. RickK 22:25, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, article does not establish notability. Megan1967 00:27, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, let's wait until someone has something more encyclopedic to say about this topic, ok? Wyss 01:23, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Perfectly welcome topic, but delete useless substub. (Comment left unsigned by User:Jmabel.)
  • True, but there is no clear policy on deleting substubs. We have seen several "useless" bontany-related substubs of 6-8 words be kept because the subject was notable. Perhaps this needs to be clarified and documented? GRider\^talk 00:35, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and allow for organic growth and expansion. Google finds over EIGHTEEN-THOUSAND hits for this term. [1] GRider\^talk 00:33, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, pointless sub-stub. JamesBurns 07:08, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.