Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Affordable luxury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Nakon 04:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Affordable luxury

Affordable luxury (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article has been copied from Wikitionary. Ohmpandya (Talk to Me...) 20:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

• No, it hasn't. There's no affordable luxury article, and even if there were, that wouldn't be a reason for deletion. Do you have any valid reason for deleting this article, that is actually based upon our Wikipedia:Deletion policy? Please always supply rationales that are firmly based upon our Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Uncle G (talk) 00:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't define its subject very well. How do we know what is "alluring"? What does "steep but affordable" even mean? Almost speediable under A1. --Alksub (talk) 00:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.