Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afflicted Quarter (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted (it's the same guys) Broken S 17:23, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Afflicted Quarter

Not notable, vanity. See previous debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afflicted Quarter. Can be speedied if the content of the article is substantially the same as before, but since I'm not an admin, I can't check this. —Caesura^(t) 15:27, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, since it was deleted before and there's still no claim of notability (per WP:MUSIC). The article might have more text but I seriously doubt any of it makes it more encyclopedic. The article clearly states that they've not been signed, they haven't published anything, and have just barely played anywhere. - Bobet 16:04, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - I loved this quote (at the bottom) Currently the band are searching for a record label to sign them.. Well, don't expect Wikipedia to sign you! Go to a radio station or something. That's where you go. Also note recreation of previously deleted content: [1]. So unless its a totally different article, its a candidate for speedy. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 17:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - There is no doubt these guys will get signed because of their hard rock attitudes! beeeeeooo Ralphredimix 17:09, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.