Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AeroFox (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Asserting coverage in several sources without actually providing them is not very convincing. Neil ☎ 10:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AeroFox

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/AeroFox Articles for deletion/AeroFox (2nd nomination)
AeroFox (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I believe this was speedied before, but I nominate this for AfD due to sources stated and for general non-notability. It seems to be just another quasi-advertising article promoting the browser. Phgao 07:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. While it is not a close enough repost to be speedied, it still has the same fundamental problems as at the time of the first AfD. Fram 08:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Software package that fails notability standards. Clever idea, though. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 15:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep.just needs sources or references that . 203.221.238.37 08:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - unable to find any sources to support the notability of this software. -- Whpq 15:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep coverage in multiple published sources independent of the subject(if anyone has checked these references and found them to be inaccurate, I'll change my opinion), therefore passes content standards. Cynical 17:34, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
    • If somebody can provide those links, that might be a saver. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

*Keep per Cynical —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.221.238.209 (talk) 12:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC) — 203.221.238.209 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. and is likely same person who attempted to close this AfD.[1]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.