Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advent of the Zenith

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as a non-notable map/game-guide for WoW, WP:WEB and WP:NOT both refer. (aeropagitica) 22:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Advent of the Zenith

Advent of the Zenith (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No claim to meet WP:WEB. No independent coverage. Wikipedia is not a game guide for fan-made Warcraft maps. — Scientizzle 18:35, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete it looks more like some sort of advertising more than anything else. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kessingler (talk • contribs) 19:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete - the article fails WP:WEB totally, and is just advertising for someone's map. Very WP:NN. Ale_Jrbtalk 20:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Hold up on that a second. Right now, the art was just made by the map creator, and as such is POV. However, the map is one of the more used ones on Warcraft III. Seeing as Dota is on and considered notable enough, I would say that AotZ can be notable as well. As such, the only issue is writing style, which can be changed (and which I will get around to doing ASAP). VfD is a tad harsh for PoV writing, don't you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Platonic Nirvana (talk • contribs)
    • Defense of the Ancients/DotA Allstars has at least a claim to notability:

      DotA Allstars v5.84c was featured in the Malaysian and Singaporean World Cyber Games 2005 national finals and the Cyberathlete Amateur League now runs an Open, Intermediate, Main and Invite division using DotA Allstars v6.41.

      This one doesn't. POV text isn't the issue here... — Scientizzle 18:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.