Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adult DVD rental

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Adult DVD rental

This article contains nothing whihc is not obvious from the title, and is historically a spam magnet. And those are its good parts. Just zis Guy you know? 20:56, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep. 482,000 Google hits, obviously highly notable, and I see nothing in the article that a little clean-up couldn't fix. tmopkisn ^tlka 21:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

• LOL! The fact that there are adult DVD rentals is not in disupte; the fact that the meaning of the term "adult DVD rental" is blindingly obvious is the problme here! Just zis Guy you know? 21:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. What potential does this article have that isn't already quite adequately covered by Online DVD rental and our extensive series on pornography? I see none. Spam magnets are bad enough, useless spam magnets are worse. — Haeleth Talk 21:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Haeleth. There's no doubt the concept exists, but the debate here is not notability. -- Northenglish (talk) -- 22:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Haeleth. Just a series of ordinary words forming a phrase of no standalone importance. --DaveG12345 22:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Changing vote per Haeleth, he's right, pretty much the same content, except the latter is much better. tmopkisn ^tlka 23:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. "You can rent adult DVDs online. It works just like normal online DVD rental." That's more or less what this article boils down to. As such, I really don't see why this merits a separate article. Zetawoof^(ζ) 03:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. But darn, I won't be able to watch the appearance and removal of spam links on my watch list anymore. Tsk. Tony Fox (speak) 05:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• I'm not 100% sure how to add my comments here. If this article is going to stick around then it needs to be corrected. I work for XRentDVD, and we opened in July 1999 (verified by the wayback machine). There was one other site that went live around then, I think it was blueDVD.com. I'm not looking to be viewed as a spammer, which is why I didn't edit the page. If it is going to stay up at least have someone research and put in the facts MarcP 15:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.