Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adriana Porter

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 15:23, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Adriana Porter

Is this an instance of outright spam, or notability? GRider\^talk 21:39, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, seems she was most likely responsible for the Wiccan Rede. Cleanup and expand. Megan1967 00:43, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Concur Kappa 15:20, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• As it is now, delete--nixie 02:13, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Obviously notable in the Wiccan movement. I've gotten rid of the "spam" for the "forthcoming" book. As it is a stub, it certainly needs to be expanded, but that does not make it deletable. HyperZonk^talk 18:18, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable. Xezbeth 17:43, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Please expand as it is hard to find reliable background elsewhere, witchvox.org might be able to help 24.250.210.206 12:16, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.