Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adre'anna Jackson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 23:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adre'anna Jackson

Contested prod. Wikipedia is not a memorial, no assertion of notability of this person, and a brief flare of news events doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. >Radiant< 14:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete With all due respects for her soul, this subject was not notable when she was alive. Wikipedia is NOT a memorial. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:24, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Sorry, but she was unnotable. The only memorial location in Wikipedia is Deceased Wikipedians, and even then, they had to be prolific editors. Useight 16:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment For the record, the subject was not a Wikipedian at all. You may not have intended that, but you had me confused there for a moment. --Dhartung | Talk 18:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Sorry for the confusion, I was just pointing out the fact that there is a memorial in existence within Wikipedia. It's not relevant to this article's subject and she does not belong there, I was only mentioning it for informational purposes. Useight 16:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

• Merge relevant data to Terapon Adhahn and delete. Sadly, the only thing notable about the poor girl is her killer. Alba 17:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect per Alba. --Dhartung | Talk 18:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
• I'm the one who de-prodded the article, and I noted then that a merge/redirect was fine by me. Note that Adhahn is still only a "person of interest," though, and that a new article[1] offers a (farfetched, to my eyes) theory linking Jack McClellan to the killing. --Groggy Dice T | C 02:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Sorry state of affairs for her family, but still not notable. Agree with nom about memorials. I will also say, do not redirect to alleged killer. I'm not a big fan of redirecting victims to their killers, seems harsh to me, and disrespectful to the family. Keeper | 76 16:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.