Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adoration (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Voice of All @|Esperanza|E M 02:45, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Adoration (band)
Article doesn't establish notability, Allmusic hasn't heard of them, can't get any worthwhile Google hits for them. -- Captain Disdain 01:04, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. -- Captain Disdain 01:04, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Strong delete not only does the article utterly fail to establish notability, the fact that the author removed the AfD notice just screams that this thing needs to go. CanadianCaesar 01:13, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Removed it twice, in fact. And I wouldn't be surprised to see it happen again, as the second time around he replaced the AfD notice with "FUCK YOU DONT DELETE MY SHIT WHILE IM WORKIN ON MAKING IT GOOD." Hey, buddy, if you're reading this -- the AfD notice won't affect your work on it; if you turn it into a good article about a notable band, it will not get deleted, and I (and, I presume, Caesar over there) will be glad to change our votes. If, on the other hand, it's a non-notable band (see WP:Music for guidelines about that), you're probably wasting your time. In any case, if you keep deleting the AfD notice, you'll only hurt your chances and end up being banned in the process. There's no point in that. -- Captain Disdain 01:22, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- And, to top it off, he just edited this page to change our votes. Guess he really doesn't want to edit Wikipedia. -- Captain Disdain 01:22, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Removed it twice, in fact. And I wouldn't be surprised to see it happen again, as the second time around he replaced the AfD notice with "FUCK YOU DONT DELETE MY SHIT WHILE IM WORKIN ON MAKING IT GOOD." Hey, buddy, if you're reading this -- the AfD notice won't affect your work on it; if you turn it into a good article about a notable band, it will not get deleted, and I (and, I presume, Caesar over there) will be glad to change our votes. If, on the other hand, it's a non-notable band (see WP:Music for guidelines about that), you're probably wasting your time. In any case, if you keep deleting the AfD notice, you'll only hurt your chances and end up being banned in the process. There's no point in that. -- Captain Disdain 01:22, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Good luck with the vandal. --Anetode 04:18, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. -- As per nomination. Ben D. 06:08, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. We need a policy for bands, this is not myspace. --JJay 11:27, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. There is a policy/criteria: WP:MUSIC, which Adoration does not meet.--Isotope23 13:48, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - nn CLW 14:35, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
