Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adenin TECHNOLOGIES

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 20:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Adenin TECHNOLOGIES

Adenin TECHNOLOGIES (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Being named in the Top 100 Companies that Matter doesn't seem to be enoguh to meet notability. User has also created OC Systems which has been speedied several times. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete coverage appears limited to press releases and I don't find evidence to verify the award, even if it's enough for notability. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 18:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• Weak delete - of the three cites, the first is reliable, the second is a blog, and the third does not even mention the company. Ghits as noted above do not reveal much more. Is there anything else out there? Bearian (talk) 16:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.