Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adamolmazlar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:09, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Adamolmazlar

Hoax. Zero google hits. --202.156.6.54 00:31, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. — ceejayoz ^talk 00:34, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• delete hoaxes. — brighterorange (talk) 00:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. -- NSLE _{(Communicate!)} ^<Contribs> 00:46, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete and perhaps move to BJAODN. --TantalumTelluride 00:50, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Note: 62.177.150.218 has repeatedly removed the AfD notice. I recommend protecting the page against recreation when deleted. — ceejayoz ^talk 00:59, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Hoax. *drew 01:24, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - unless the author is able to provide some evidence. — Haeleth Talk 20:53, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Turkish suffixes may be the problem that prevents a healthy google search. Search instead for "adamolmaz," "adam olmaz," or "adam olmazlar." The "lar" at the end of the word simply makes a word plural. Languages like English or Chinese are very analytic, and analytic languages have an advantage for internet searches. Synthetic languages like Latin or agglutinating languages such as Japanese or Turkish don't do so well because the root of the word, which is what you find in the dictionary, is not used by itself; suffixes are added onto it.

• Comment. I was able to verify that some of the names given in the article are, in fact, academics in mathematics and philoshopy. I am not sure why a negative Google search would be evidence of a hoax. More likely a non-notable "movement" which could be kept as a stub or deleted if unverifiable (by Google or other reference). Dystopos 22:38, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.