This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
No relevant Google hits. 2600 children? I smell a hoax. smoddy 22:24, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Or an attack page. Is this a speedy under the new policy? - Lucky 6.9 22:47, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Under Article ss. 6&7? I don't really think so. It pushes the margin, but it asserts notability and it isn't that short. smoddy 22:50, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Delete hoax, plain and simple, it would be googleable for something like that alfrin 22:48, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.