Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Woeger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 21:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Adam Woeger

Article is pure vanity to promote an unknown song writer and band. The content of the article was mostly added by an anon. user and another user with few edits [1] has been promoting this band on Wikipedia as well. A google search for "Adam Woeger" brings up 843 including personal websites, internet chat, newsgroups, and yahoo profiles. This is an non-notable person and should be deleted created for vanity. As the article says, Adam is considered to be one of the earliest people to use the Internet as an evangelism tool. Wikipedia isn't a personal promotional tool. His band Prays is now also listed for deletion because the same person who added information to Woeger created and was the only one to add information to the band related article. Also delete the redirect page. Arbustoo 21:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Arbustoo 21:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

* Merge some of the detail into Prays and delete. Well-researched nomination. Adrian Lamo · 21:46, 3 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as prayscruft. Adrian Lamo · 22:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Prays I also listed for deletion. Created by the same person who created this article and others related to the band. A google search ("Adam Woeger" prays) has around 150 hits. Arbustoo 21:59, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Delete reads like an autobiography. Self-promotion ka1iban 22:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom --kingboyk 03:34, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all of the above. --Kinu 02:46, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as vanity. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 04:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 07:18, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete massively excessive coverage of a member of a mior Christian band. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 10:10, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Prodego ^talk 14:30, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, massive vanitycruft. feydey 17:47, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's vanity. It's a better written vanity article than most, but it does seem to fail WP:MUSIC for the musical aspects, and reeks of a personal adverisement for this person. --Wingsandsword 09:16, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.