Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Wise

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-27 06:20Z

[edit] Adam Wise

Adam Wise (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Lack of notability. Ozgod 04:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak keep There's some pretty important positions in there, but it reads like a cut and paste from an official bio. With some fleshing out and basic research, this could be a worthwhile article. If it survives the AfD I'll see what can be added. Jeendan 06:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep per Jeendan. This should have been tagged with {{unref}} and/or {{notability}} before coming here. Sources will not be hard to find. John Vandenberg 06:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • weak keep no problem about N, he's been Equerry to Prince Andrew and Prince Edward, & Aide-de-Camp to The Queen. Sourcing will be easy enough. DGG 07:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. Kolindigo 07:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Private secretary to two princes is notable. -- Necrothesp 12:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete, unsourced assertions about living people. If Sourced and referenced by end of this AfD change to Keep Alf photoman 16:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notability is well-established, and quality of an article is not a criteria for deletion. I wish folks would stop nominating articles because they're weak—It's not a valid reason for deletion. Perhaps a more liberal use of Wikipedia:Requests for expansion should be encouraged. —xanderer Flag of the United States 00:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Yes, would cut the work here by about one-thirdDGG 01:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.