Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This could have been speedied, since no valid reason was given for deletion and no other editors agreed with the nomination. Kafziel ^Talk 14:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adam Williams

Adam Williams (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Lack of notability. Ozgod 04:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

• His IMDB profile lists over 90 credits over the course of 4 decades. You'll have to provide evidence to show these roles are non-speaking or otherwise minor if he's to be called non-notable. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, in this case just saying not-notable in the nomination is not enough due to the amount of films this actor was involved in. On the other hand, this article lacks sources and references, a reason enough to take a closer look. Alf photoman 16:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Professional entertainer, considerable resume. Noability is not an issue, quality of entry is. Recommend Wikipedia:Requests for expansion tag. —xanderer 00:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.