Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Siegel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-26 09:10Z

[edit] Adam Siegel

Adam Siegel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Lack of notability, references and updates. Ozgod 03:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep so long as Excel (band) is notable enough to have its own article. Article needs references, but there doesn't seem to be any potential dispute about the content (again, provided that the band is notable). Feeeshboy 06:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, it is either keep or not. Notable today is notable tomorrow, even if only a handful of people remember Alf photoman 16:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The article is essentially a list of bands he's in or has been in, information that could be easily be found in the band articles. John Reaves (talk) 06:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
What if you want to find out which bands he's been in. You'd search by his name, right? - Mgm|(talk) 12:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and cleanup. It may be lacking references now, but seeing as he's part of a notable band that's probably easy to remedy for the Cleanup TaskForce project. At the very least this should be redirected to the most relevant band. - Mgm|(talk) 12:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. As a founding member of Excel and a member of Infectious Grooves he's notable, althought he article needs work: discography, better bio, more links and references. Freshacconci 18:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Member of Infectious Grooves is enough to establish notability. Granted, the article is way below Wikipedia standards, but subject is certainly notable enough for an entry. —xanderer Flag of the United States 00:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.