Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Nunes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snowy delete. No WP:NOTE; a WP:COI created by a WP:SPA user. Definitely WP:VANITY, no WP:RS, not WP:V. Sr13 08:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adam Nunes

This is an unsourced orphan biography of a living person, whose accomplishments seem to be admirable but rather low key for an encyclopedia. It looks like a vanity piece. I accordingly popped a proposed deletion tag on it a few hours ago. Whereupon someone removed it, and here we are. I suggest that if this article cannot be at least reliably sourced it should be deleted. --Tony Sidaway 03:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete this. It reads like a vanity piece and googling his name doesn't reveal any fame. Foobaz·o< 03:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete definately vanity.Balloonman 04:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as an unsourced and unimpressive bio. YechielMan 04:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No assertion of notability, article written by a SPA. Play-by-play of high school basketball games does not qualify one as a "well known" broadcaster. Caknuck 04:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete I love the part about his career making the play by play calls while playing Tecmo Super Bowl. —Gaff ^ταλκ 05:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No assertion of notability, likely vanity Bigdaddy1981 05:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete cant see any apparent proof of notability, probably vanity like what is stated above. Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 07:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no obvious route to notability at this time. Created by WP:SPA Snootrawk (talk · contribs), so WP:COI seals the deal. --Dhartung | Talk 07:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.