Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Christopher Strange
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — Trilobite (Talk) 03:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Adam Christopher Strange
- Keep - I looked at the links from this page and believe they offer a doorway to enrichment for anyone. Food for thought: "encyclopaedia, coming into English with the sense “general course of instruction,” first recorded in 1531. In New Latin the word was chosen as the title of a reference work covering all knowledge. The first such use in English is recorded in 1644."(The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition--207.105.138.131 22:27, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - You guys are so harsh. How does a living artist ever get over the 'nn' if nobody sees his/her work? If you really think my work is "valueless" please delete immediately. --A.Strange Singularity 20:32, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- It's nothing personal, but Wikipedia shouldn't be used to promote oneself. Become notable, then someone will write an article about you. Artists do have ways to promote themselves other than here, surely. --Etacar11 17:57, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- but isn't it more fun to cheat? You're point is well taken. Interesting to note 95% of the population thinks all art is nn. I should have joined the circus - Singularity 22:27, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- It's nothing personal, but Wikipedia shouldn't be used to promote oneself. Become notable, then someone will write an article about you. Artists do have ways to promote themselves other than here, surely. --Etacar11 17:57, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable artist/filmmaker vanity. Possible advert. 3 Google hits, only one that isn't from his webiste. Scimitar 9 July 2005 18:16 (UTC)
- Delete - Definitely nn/vanity, probably advertising. --TheMidnighters 9 July 2005 18:26 (UTC)
- Delete nnanity. Only gets 3 Google hits, and the top one is his own site. -Splash 01:52, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn vanity. --Etacar11 04:29, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 07:42, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete non notable. Was also vane enough to add self-promotion to Mona Lisa yesterday [1]. -- Solipsist 18:13, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
