Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Boettiger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Adam Boettiger

Adam Boettiger (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable, full of tons of peacock terms, direct copy from the subject's website with the copyright holder's permission. Despite all of the flowery terms, there are no reliable sources and nothing really there which explains why this non-notable presidential descendant should have an article. Corvus cornixtalk 00:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 02:02, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as a resume of a non notable person. Montco (talk) 04:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable and completely unreferenced. CrazyChemGuy (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete RS exist but they cover him in the context of his position, which does not appear notable. It's no different tan any other business person. OTRS or not, a copy/paste of your web bio is not an encyclopedic article and there doesn't appear to be sufficient information from which to build an article TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 02:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Badly written with no assertion of notability. —  Wenli (reply here) 04:24, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment My reverting the copyright violation notice because of an OTRS ticket does not speak to notability etc. of the article, only that there is permission of the copyright holder. --Benn Newman (talk) 20:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.