Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action Police CFTC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 13:38, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Action Police CFTC

seems to be a non notable French police union that only recieve 0.32% of the vote. Do we really need an article for a group this small? Pboyd04 05:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup. Looks like editors who know what they are doing are working on this and may be related to recent French rioting. -- JJay 05:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete A tiny union that is more noisy than notable. Moreover the article is chockfull of POV and I'm not sure there's anyone knowledgeable enough to clean it up. Madman 06:23, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep The union is notable. Check google and you'll see French press articles referring to it. To assume that there would be no-one on wiki with a basic understanding on French politics is quite strange. --Soman 09:15, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep -- clearly has significance in the light of recent French politico-social history. Possibly to be reviewed in 12 months' time, but deletion at this stage would, I suggest, be premature. --SockpuppetSamuelson 09:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep : "non notable French police union that only recieve 0.32% of the vote" is correct, but unfortunately not complete; this union, due to the strident discourse of its president, has recieved an attention by the media way off proportions with its importance in terms of representativity. Because of this, I think that it is important to have this article to put some insights and perspective to it (though the article does need work and attention). Rama 11:36, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep notable in France. Choalbaton 13:04, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.