Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actinomorphous

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Moving it to Actinomorphous flower. Rx StrangeLove 05:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Actinomorphous

This is nothing more than an attempt to define the word Actinomorphous. It is not a candidate to be included at Wiktionary, however, because the definition is, in fact, incorrect.

• Keep or transwiki to wikitionary, as it has a number of backlinks. I've updated the article in an effort to have a more correct definition. --Interiot 22:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki Renata3
• Delete, approaches biologycruft. Stifle 00:20, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Re-listing to generate more discussion. Please add new comments below this message. Mindmatrix 19:20, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• Transwiki if the definition is correct otherwise delete. Movementarian 08:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Already at wiktionary actinomorphous with proper definition. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so delete. Movementarian 19:11, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Transwikification is not an option. As per our Wikipedia:Naming conventions (adjectives) and Special:Whatlinkshere/Actinomorphous flower, rename to Actinomorphous flower. Uncle G 21:31, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.