Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ActiTIME

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 00:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ActiTIME

ActiTIME (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

procedural - PROD removed - NN web-software - the only mentions of this seem to the usual "this exists" listings and user-generated content that is the hallmark of lower-rung (if that's the right term - in terms of notability not quality) product. Fredrick day 10:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Weak delete Just found one real source, but it's kinda borderline and doesn't really give strong case for note. Will switch to keep if stronger sources can be found and the article expanded, but as it stands now, it lacks adequate context, lacks any attempt to demonstrate a case for note, and lacks more than the one third party source. MrZaius^talk 13:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Not notable. The Dawn article helps, but not enough. Realkyhick 15:31, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.