Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acoustic branding

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 04:24, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Acoustic branding

Marketing/branding terminology, feels like a neologism, google gives 328 hits for the exact phrase.--nixie 03:26, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, I only get 122 google hits but they seem relevent and not all from the same place. Kappa 10:31, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep It's a concept I recognized, even from this poorly written article. (e.g. the Intel sound or the "Law and Order" noise, these examples may not make much sense to those outside the USA) Dsmdgold 12:48, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and Expand.Gorrister 18:51, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and CleanUp. P Ingerson 19:36, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.