Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acousmatic

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.

I agree with the nominator that this was a mere dictionary definition. Frankly, even with Kappa's expansion, I believe this still is a dicdef. But I believe it may be possible for this to expand into a full article. If, however, it has not been expanded in a reasonable amount of time, it may become appropriate to renominate the article.

Comment: The article itself was never tagged with {{vfd}}. It is therefore reasonable to assume that this discussion did not get the visibility it needed. Please be cautious before using this decision as precedent for any future decisions. Rossami (talk) 04:33, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Acousmatic

Delete It is a dictionary definition, and I have now made a acousmatic page at wiktionary to replace it. Superm401 23:26, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, as a type of music it has potential to be expanded. Kappa 03:08, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: expanded to include "acousmatic sound" in cinema. Kappa 04:02, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Megan1967 07:20, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.