Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acellus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 04:42, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Acellus

Page prodded as possible spam. User rewrote but still seemed like advert for web company, I removed the prod tag and asked for independent references to notability. Today a new user with one edit removed the references tag without adding any new info or explaining how this is notable and not spam, so I'm sending it to AfD. <--that was me, delete by the way. Thatcher131 20:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as advertising for Acellus.com. —ERcheck @ 03:08, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertising Maustrauser 04:07, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Advertisment Avi 20:54, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• DO NOT DELETE!!! How can this be a encyclopedia without allowing me to spew forth my unwanted spam so I get free hosting and advertising on Wikipedia! If you delete this I'm going to go to the International Court and say you abused my right to steal your bandwith!!! ... *Cough*... vote bolded. -AKMask 00:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

In case that that was confusing, as I've been advised it is, my vote is a rather resounding Delete, as spam. -AKMask 01:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

• DO NOT DELETE-- This page needs to be rewritten to eliminate the advertising and to include factual material. The Acellus Mathematics program represents a significant development in math education and has become an important item of discussion at most national math education conferences. It would be a mistake to lose the information. Firewriter 05:07 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• DO NOT DELETE--I believe this article can be salvaged and the information on a new approach to education technology gleaned from it.InfoInsatiate 05:45 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not as possible spam but definite spam. Non-noteworthy. Ifnord 18:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• DO NOT DELETE--I think that Acellus is ground breaking technology, and with the article re-written, It could be a good addition. Jacerox1234 04:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.