Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acegi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a copyright violation of a copyrighted ("� 2004-2006, Acegi Technology Pty Limited") non-GFDL web page. This is Copyright Judo. Uncle G 19:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Acegi

Page does not assert notability, failing WP:CORP. It also reads like spam. --Natalie 17:33, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. This article reads like an infomercial or very long brochure... Natalie, just for future reference, add new discussions to the bottom of the list. :) Srose (talk) 18:11, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• This page should NOT be deleted, though it definately needs someone to edit it. Acegi is a valid and widely used method of enforcing security in web applications. Natalie a history major is clearly not an expert in the field, and should therefore educate herself, before automatically deleting anything simply because she doesn't approve of the format.
  • Please sign your posts. Also please read WP:CORP. My education or biography is not relevant: the article needs to assert the companies notability, which it does not. --Natalie 18:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non notable company per WP:CORP. And yes this is just a copy from the companies own web site yikes.Obina 18:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.