Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accredited scientist

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 13:18, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Accredited scientist

The phrase could have many meanings. The normal one (i.e. a scientist accredited by some sort of institution) is predominant in Google, but isn't worthy of an article. This one doesn't seem to be mentioned. DJ Clayworth 21:52, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. incorrect dictdef. RJFJR 23:35, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
• There's someone somewhere named Stuart Mendelssohn and going under title "accredited scientist", that the author is having a go at. Delete. Uncle G 23:52, 2005 Feb 5 (UTC)
• Delete, dicdef. --Idont Havaname 00:02, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Lectonar 08:17, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. There are exactly 290 hits for "accredited scientist" on Google: it's simply not a common expression, and seems to be used mostly by people who have no idea what scientists do or why it's silly to think that anyone would be accrediting people as "scientists" rather than something more specific. - Nunh-huh 08:21, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, maybe worthy of a mention on some other page, but not important enough for its own article.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.