Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accidents Sketch (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No concensus (default keep). JERRY ^talk _contribs 17:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Accidents Sketch

Accidents Sketch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

procedural nomination—version brought to AFD: This was previously involved in a train wreck AFD which yielded no consensus. Now found in the PROD workstream; PROD nominator states "fails WP:EPISODE guidelines as there are no reliable sources to prove it's individual notability. Also fails WP:PLOT". User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

• Note: WikiProject Monty Python has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete No individual notability.Kww (talk) 21:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

• Up to you, but its pretty much all discussed here --http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Several_Monty_Python_sketches. As previously mentioned, there was no resolution. I suggested merging into a larger episodic summary, but got no response. Also, I haven't gotten around to doing the merge, but plan to do so. thx.--10stone5 (talk) 22:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• Merge to List of Monty Python's Flying Circus episodes. Article fails WP:EPISODE and WP:FICTION and there is absolutely no assertion of notability for this particular episode. Suggesting merge over redirect as the list article has no episode summaries. Collectonian (talk) 06:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.

—Collectonian (talk) 06:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 03:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per (original) nom. No evidence of individual notability. Tevildo (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.