Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acceleware

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Needs cleanup, however. Dreadstar † 04:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Acceleware

Acceleware (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

NN software development company. Article reads like ad copy with grammar errors. Both major contributors have WP:COI (possibly same user). Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep - I was actually a bit surprised to see this article pop up on my watchlist today; it seems that I tagged it for speedy deletion at some point or another and Twinkle did the rest for me. At any rate, despite the poor writing in the current article, from what I can see the company appears to be notable not only as a major contributor for developing algorithms for independent GPU-based processing but also in the medical imaging industry. See [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and so on. --jonny-mt 17:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. The article needs cleanup, but the subject is notable. Google News (excluding press releases) finds 53 hits. There should be enough information to make a decent article that doesn't read like an ad. —BradV 01:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - poor article but not Afd. ChessCreator (talk)
  • Delete unless cleaned up. Stifle (talk) 18:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - May need some cleanup, but does not deserve afd. Victao lopes (talk) 00:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per Stifle. Daniel (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.