Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acanthus (Mage: the Awakening)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to/merge with Mage: The Awakening. Keilana(recall) 21:40, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Acanthus (Mage: the Awakening)

Acanthus (Mage: the Awakening) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Has no notability or meaning outside the game/fantasy. Pharmboy (talk) 18:25, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment - Editors who comment on this AfD may also want to comment on this, this, this, and this. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 20:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with Mage: The Awakening. Subject is nonnotable outside of the in-game universe, per WP:FICT, but content would be useful to include in the parent article. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 20:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
  • The Acanthus article already mentions the use in fiction and the current title wouldn't be a plausible redirect, so, in the context of no real world notability, just delete. Addhoc (talk) 21:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep; there's no reason not to cover this in detail. It is mentioned only briefly in the main article. Everyking (talk) 07:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with Mage: The Awakening - as per lifebaka above. There is some useful information here, but not enough to merit it's own article, nor could it be sourced enough to do so. Web Warlock (talk) 16:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: WikiProject Role-playing games has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete no independent coverage, fails WP:N Percy Snoodle (talk) 09:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.