Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academic support

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, unreferenced --Steve _(Stephen) ^talk 07:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Academic support

Academic support (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Has been marked unreferenced since October. I see no evidence that this is a universal or even widespread phenomenon, although references to the contrary would of course be appreciated. JavaTenor 05:00, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. No cited sources. Useight 05:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, as per nom. Lankiveil 06:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC).
• Weak Delete, unless it can be shown to be notable. Here in the UK, academic support seems to be a common term; if the article covered that, I'd say keep. Adrian M. H. 23:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, like Adrian said, it could be notable, but the article has no sources and I doubt that there could be much more information added to it. *Cremepuff222* 23:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. Hydrogen Iodide 16:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.