Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abysmal Crucifix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, due to copyright violations. — David Fuchs ^(talk) 02:13, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Abysmal Crucifix

Abysmal Crucifix (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable band --DimaG 00:22, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

• This nomination was broken; I have fixed it by creating this discussion page. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 00:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

• Comment How good does a hoax have to be before it becomes notable? ELIMINATORJR 00:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. I have no stock in this article but precedent shows that albums with 'hot singles' are usually notable enough to be kept. -- Naruttebayo 01:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Guess what? You just got had by a hoax. That's what happens when you're forced to judge based on the content of the article, when the article has no reliable sources. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

• delete - no google hits whatsoever outside of myspace, blogs, and - you guess it - Wikipedia!! This is why articles need sources. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, seems to be a hoax. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 01:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.