Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absolutehype

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete now that's what I call consensus. W.marsh 00:12, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Absolutehype

Non-notable website. No Alexa rating. One google hit and it appears to have been created by the owner itself. Delete Dr Debug (Talk) 01:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, vanity. Royboycrashfan 01:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - freeloaders. Get 'em off our encyclo.! Camillus (talk)
• Delete. Non-notable, WP:VSCA. --Kinu 01:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Advertisement. EdGl 01:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, advertising. —ERcheck @ 01:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable Where (talk) 01:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable, vanity. JoshuaZ 03:33, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —Brim 04:19, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Reyk 06:34, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. TheRingess 06:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Ardenn 07:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, in case 11 other opinions weren't enough. Adrian Lamo ·· 11:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable Prodego ^talk 14:18, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —This user has left wikipedia 18:50 2006-02-05
• Delete Non-notable - • | Đܧ§§Ť | • ^{T | C} 21:49, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this absolute hype. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 22:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. —Sesel 22:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete mercilessly as advertisement. Bad ideas 06:20, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above.Blnguyen 05:07, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Advertisement and vanity. --Wingsandsword 08:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Absolutedelete. What some people won't do for attention....--み使い Mitsukai 15:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.