Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abnak Label

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Abnak records (although I think someone should seriously look at that article and consider expanding and sourcing, or nominating it for deletion). Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Abnak Label

Abnak Label (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This page is a duplicate. See Abnak records. Undeath (talk) 05:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

• Merge/Redirect and speedy close. No need for an AfD. Jfire (talk) 05:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
• I don't think a redirect is necessary. Just delete the Label page. There is no need in even keeping the name. It's the exact same article with two different titles. Delete one entry and keep the other.Undeath (talk) 05:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The very fact that somebody created a duplicate article is a very strong indication that a redirect is appropriate. Jfire (talk) 05:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

• The same person made both articles. It would be different if it were two different people.Undeath (talk) 05:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
• Still, in this case a redirect won't hurt. It's possible the user didn't know how to do redirects, so put the article in the same place. matt91486 (talk) 05:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.