Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ability Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ability Online

nn website, does not meet criteria of WP:WEB Agent 86 21:20, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep perfectly notable, and important. WP:WEB is not policy. Ardenn 21:33, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no notability is asserted or implied. WP:WEB is not policy, but clearly websites must do more than exist to be included since Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Eluchil404 21:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia is not paper. Ardenn 21:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. nn site. Artw 21:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Peta 00:46, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• After two minutes looking at the website, I'm going to go with the keep; any website that has Andy Brandt, Silken Laumann, Cyndy Preston, Johnny Bower and Ron Ellis on its list of patrons has to be notable enough for us. Bearcat 04:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Bearcat. --Usgnus 15:11, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per keep arugments 216.141.226.190 14:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per BC. Blizzard of One 15:57, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.