Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhash Kumar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, especially given the recent improvements. Daniel 05:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Abhash Kumar

Abhash Kumar (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This was originally speedy-deleted as a CSD A7. DRV restored the article in light of new sources, given at the DRV. Still, weak delete given continued notability concerns, pending other opinions. Xoloz 16:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Week keep Keep (see below) on the basis of the titles of the publications given. I can not see how to document the additional publications claimed, in the absence of accessible indexes for Indian periodicals--I've asked the author of the article for assistance in this.DGG (talk) 21:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Fix or delete I'm sorry, I went through the DRV before looking at the article and there are a couple of things that trouble me. First, this article is STILL a copyvio of the usurpia article, unless usurpia is a Wikimirror. Second, blatant COI. The author of the article IS the subject.--Ispy1981 20:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment, Yousurp is mirrorring this article. But as far as I can tell, they have not made it available downstream as GFDL licensed. So its they who are in violation. --soum talk 15:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I just added 4 good references mentioned in DRV but not yet added to the article. Though they do not yet document everything, they seem quite sufficient to show his poisiton and importance. I changed from Weak Keep to Keep.DGG (talk) 03:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 13:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.