Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbotsford Traditional Secondary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure). Clear consensus discusses that the subject is notable through significant indepdendent coverage from reliable sources. WilliamH (talk) 18:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Abbotsford Traditional Secondary School

Abbotsford Traditional Secondary School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Small town school, little to support notability Oo7565 (talk) 22:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

• speedy keep high schools get articles. Potatoswatter (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • High schools must demonstrate notability to get articles. ~ Eóin (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- ~ Eóin (talk) 22:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• No claims of notability. Merge into School District 34 Abbotsford. Corvus cornix_talk 22:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - notable high school. This school was chosen to trial an innovative scheme to rent laptops to the students. TerriersFan (talk) 22:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep the one to one laptop program has resulted in the school receiving significant independent coverage. ~ Eóin (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Merge into School District 34 Abbotsford I don't believe the sources provided are notable and a news search turns up only one article about a student who goes to that school winning some photo contest, no mention of laptop program. As such, I think it fails the WP:SCHOOLS notability criteria.  Atyndall93 | talk  08:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Aside from being a high school (generally notable as such), it has those sources. Who cares if the sources are notable; the thing is that they're reliable sources, and therefore valid and useable. Nyttend (talk) 15:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as notable per TerriersFan.--Sting au Buzz Me... 06:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as per Eóin and two reliable, independent sources that directly discuss the school. DoubleBlue (Talk) 16:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - High schools are inheritantly notable if they have received coverage, as with the laptop program discussed above. Gdavid3 (talk) 19:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep for the reason given above. this is one of a string of careless nominations for afd & prod, apparently made without attention to either the need to look for sources or the precedents at AfD. DGG (talk) 00:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per above, school is notable and has received coverage through multiple non-trivial sources as such. (jarbarf) (talk) 21:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.