Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abandoned toys (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 19:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Abandoned toys

Article was previously nominated for deletion in September. The result of that discussion was to delete the article (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abandoned toys). It has since been recreated, but in a different version, so G4 doesn't apply. The article was nominated for speedy deletion by FisherQueen (talk · contribs), but the tag was removed by Musicologydreamer (talk · contribs). I'm moving this to AfD instead. No opinion. Aecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 08:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - it's an article about a project rather than a band (thus not a speedy) that fails to assert notability. MER-C 09:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to The Synthetic Dream Foundation. Insufficiently notable per WP:MUSIC to warrant its own article. --Satori Son 15:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Doing a search on the internet pulls up quite a few references, including several interviews, etc. The music is of a notably differnet style than The synthetic dream foundation, so a merger would not be appropriate. It would be like merging Graeme Revell's page with that of his old industrial band SPK. Both are notable, and by the same person, but intrinsically different. User:FinalConflict 23 October 2006 (UTC) — 68.200.110.166 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 06:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete any article with no reliable third-pary sources, no matter what it's about. Anyway, of dubious notability. Sandstein 23:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unsourced articles will have to face the music no matter what. Kavadi carrier 08:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.