Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Carter (AKA War Wounds)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Aaron Carter (AKA War Wounds)

Aaron Carter (AKA War Wounds) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Another hoax article about a supposedly upcoming album. I have been unable to find a single reference online to this - Googling for "Aaron Carter" "War Wounds" comes up with nothing relevant aside from the WP article itself. Kurt Shaped Box 14:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete No sources whatsoever included. WP:NOT#CRYSTALBALL. Kntrabssi 14:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, I did find some quotes from House of Carters here which might explain a thing or two. However, regardless of that, it's crystal balling so get rid of it. The Rambling Man 14:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's either fake, or not yet announced. Either way, delete until info appears to back it up. There was an episode of House of Carters wherein Aaron and Nick discuss potential future projects, and the possibility of a "Carter Bros" music label was discussed. Aaron stated he'd prefer the label be called "War Wounds..." symbolizing the brothers' troubled past (!?). That conversation also included a squabble over Aaron's desire to be recognized as a competent rap artist, versus Nick's (and their agents') apparent recognition that Aaron's fans expect Pop, and he should not alienate them. This particular on-screen exchange appears to be the basis for the content of the hoax. In summary, Google yields nothing so even if this *were* real, it has not yet been announced officially and therefore (as much as I do love my Aaron Carter) it does not belong on Wikipedia because it is not verifiable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BoyliciousDarian (talk • contribs) 14:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
    • oops.. ^_^ sorry, forgot to sign. (cut off the tildes in my copy+paste from notepad). BoyliciousDarian 14:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as unacceptable content, crystalballing, original research, hoax, whatever.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 17:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete As per the comments stated above. .V. [Talk|Email] 19:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete please as it is totally false, there are no reliable sources to confirm any of this. This is a hoax, and leaving it up will only cause problems and confusion. Thank you. --Camobrat 23:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.